There’s none so deaf as those who won’t hear
Monday, November 10th, 2008Twice recently I have had occasion to curse runners - under my breath, admittedly. I fundamentally will always defend runners almost to the hilt, but on these two occasions I bemoaned their gross stupidity. Runners are humans, after all, and most humans are stupid. On each occasion one of these runners ran out into the road that I was turning into in my car, complete with precious cargo of three-year-old daughter strapped into the back seat. They didn’t look, and they didn’t slow down, so both times I had to make an emergency stop and risk getting rammed from behind, which with my daughter in the back was a horrifying thought. (I’m not too keen on the idea of her daddy getting hurt, either, actually).
Now the reason these runners stepped blithely off the kerb into the path of my not-speeding motor was that they were listening to their iPods. How would the law view it if my nightmare scenario ensued, and in stopping suddenly for this cretinous, moronic, irresponsible, iPod-listening runner in order not to cause them harm, I was rammed from behind and my tiny, vulnerable precious little girl was hurt? First of all I suppose the driver of the car behind would be responsible, because you always are when you hit the car in front, no matter how suddenly it stops. But if was shown that I had stopped unreasonably - for example, in the eyes of the law, stopping for a dog is reasonable, but stopping for a cat is not - then could a third party, the stupid runner could be invoked?
