Part 1, ‘rules’ 1-5.
There is a lot of dogma out there. Assertions that are not in themselves untrue, but which may not be appropriate. Received wisdom passed down but lying unquestioned. So we thought we’d look at some things that are regularly flung around the running community, often regarded as ‘rules’, and present the alternative view. We’ll look at 5 ‘rules’ we think you can break today and the other half next week, so stay tuned for a bit of controversy?
Rule 1 - ‘Get shoes for your running style - motion control, or support, or neutral, etc’. This is one of the biggest pieces of dogma out there. Go onto any forum where beginning runners ask for advice and this ‘rule’ is invariably trotted out.
We say: the vast majority of shoes are over-engineered, and lead to chronic foot weakness, which in turn places extra stress on the hips and low back. Research tends to show a link between shoe technology and injury rate ie the ‘more’ shoe you have the likelier you are toget an injury. We say less is more! Pay less, get less shoe - a basic model, or racing flats - and make your feet do a little work for a change.
Rule 2 - ‘use a heart monitor to gauge your effort’ - eg for tempo runs and races
We say: what’s wrong with RPE - rate of perceived exertion. Learn to rate your effort on a scale of 6 - 20, or 1-10 (Borg’s scales), and get in tune with your body, using the most sophisticated super-computer in existence (it’s in your skull!) instead of obsessing about some numbers on a display on your wrist. Hydration, temperature, nutritional status and different fitness levels can all, as eminent coach Jack Daniels observes, play merry hell with your HR readings. As does ‘arousal’, the amount of adrenalin coursing through your veins, which is of course a major factor in a race.You can’t really rely on them as an accurate gauge, so in effect RPE is just as accurate. Plus you get the benefit in a race of not having to worry if ‘your numbers’ are ok - there are none.
Rule 3 - ‘use a heart monitor to gauge pace’ eg for interval training
We say: subtly different from rule 2 above, and there’s a clue in the rule name - pace is best judged according to pace. A set of 400m reps run at a given heart-rate may be a good work-out for a given energy system, true, but pace is pace. You want to run a 40 minute 10k? Then you have to run to a certain pace, not a heart-rate, and you have to run to it in training. That’s not to say there won’t be a correlation between pace and the numbers on your monitor -and if there is a close correlation, doesn’t that mean you can ditch the monitor and use the real-world measure of how long it takes you to cover a certain distance?
Rule 4 - ‘build up mileage before introducing speed work’
We say: most weekend warriors need speed more than endurance. Speed is a precious commodity; it is an evanescent and ephemeral entity, and needs to be carefully nurtured and preserved. Endurance is slow to take its leave, and decent deposits in the training bank return decent interest. So, as Coe (not sure if it was Seb the runner or Peter the coach, although it sounds more like dad) said, ‘If speed is the name of the game, never stray too far from it’. That means doing something to allow your legs to turn over quickly all the time; every week.
Rule 5 - ‘make sure you stretch before running’ .
We say: research seems to show that muscles lose their capacity to produce force after a strecthing session. Research seems to show that stretching sessions before running in no way diminish propensity to injury. Let’s be clear - we are referring to traditional ’static stretching’, and while many clued-up coaches and athletes are avoiding this as a way of preparing for a run, it is still bandied around as dogma too. Runners are largely conservative people (?) and sometimes tradition dies hard. We are big fans of mobilisation before running.
We’ll be back with more sharp sticks in the eye f running orthodoxy next Monday. Go for a run, and question everything - including this blog!